| 4,356 | 41 | 1613 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
企业高质量发展需要以数字化转型带动绿色化转型。数字化转型能够通过外部监督效应提高企业绿色化转型意愿,通过信息改善效应增加企业绿色化转型资源,通过生产智能化效应提升企业绿色化转型能力,从而促进企业绿色化转型。以2010—2022年沪深A股制造业上市公司为研究样本,采用技术创新、生产水平、环境保护、社会评价4个维度的8项指标综合评价企业绿色化转型水平,分析表明:企业数字化转型对绿色化转型具有显著的促进作用,该促进效应在高科技企业、非重污染企业、非西部地区企业中更为显著;数字化转型能够通过提高媒体关注度、降低信息不对称程度、提高生产智能化水平等路径来促进企业绿色化转型;政府环境规制强度的提高会强化企业数字化转型对绿色化转型的促进作用,但该调节效应在重污染企业中不显著。因此,应重视和发挥媒体的监督作用,大力推进信息平台建设,以数智化加快发展新质生产力,完善环境规制制度体系,有序推进企业数字化和绿色化协同发展。
Abstract:Promoting the coordinated development of digital transformation and green transformation of manufacturing enterprises, and using digitalization to drive the green transformation of enterprises, are not only an inevitable trend under technological and economic development, but also the aspiration of the country and the people. Relying on digital technology, the development of new productive forces including smart manufacturing is both an internal requirement and a significant focus for promoting high-quality development. How to promote the green transformation of manufacturing enterprises is an important theoretical frontier issue that needs urgent attention.Based on the CSMAR database, CNRDS database, and annual reports of listed companies, this paper takes the A-share listed manufacturing companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2010 to 2022 as samples, adopts the entropy weight method, and combines the variables measuring the green development of enterprises in some studies to innovatively construct the comprehensive index of the green transformation of enterprises in this paper. Referring to Wu Fei et al.(2021), the text analysis method is used to measure the degree of enterprise digital transformation through the keyword frequency, and the impact of manufacturing enterprises' digital transformation on green transformation is empirically tested. The study finds that the digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises can significantly promote the green transformation of enterprises. This conclusion still holds after controlling for endogeneity and robustness factors. Existing literature predominantly examines the impact mechanism of enterprise green development from perspectives such as green R&D investment, environmental protection investment, and green total factor productivity. In contrast, this study focuses on both the internal and external environments of enterprises, considering not only behaviors and variables directly related to enterprise green development but also conducting mechanism studies from three aspects: transformation dynamics, resources for transformation, and production capabilities to transform resources into final outcomes. It finds that digital transformation promotes its green transformation by increasing media attention, reducing information asymmetry, and enhancing the level of smart manufacturing. Heterogeneity research shows that the promoting effect of digital transformation on green transformation is stronger in high-tech enterprises, non-heavy pollution enterprises, and non-western region enterprises. Regional environmental regulations positively moderate the promoting effect of digital transformation on corporate green transformation, although this moderation effect is not significant across technology attribute heterogeneity groups and is stronger for non-heavy pollution enterprises compared with heavy pollution enterprises.Compared with previous literature, this study expands on three aspects. Firstly, it expands on the research related to the economic consequences of digital transformation and the factors influencing green transformation. Existing literature often measures enterprise green transformation in a singular manner, whereas this paper innovatively constructs a comprehensive index for enterprise green transformation using multiple indicators. Secondly, unlike previous studies that typically examine mechanisms from a single, green development-related perspective, this paper explores the impact mechanisms of digital transformation on green transformation in manufacturing enterprises from three aspects: media attention, information asymmetry, and the level of intelligent manufacturing. Thirdly, the research in this paper has a certain degree of practical guidance significance, which is beneficial for enterprises to adjust their transformation strategies, respond to macro policies, adapt to changes in the external economic environment, and their development and construction. At the same time, it enhances the attention of relevant stakeholders to media governance, capital market information, new quality productive forces including intelligent technology, enterprise heterogeneity, and regional environmental regulation.
[1] LAMPERTI F,DOSI G,NAPOLETANO M,et al.Climate change and green transitions in an agent-based integrated assessment model[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2020,153:119806.
[2] MUNDACA L,MARKANDYA A.Assessing regional progress towards a ‘green energy economy[J].Applied Energy,2016,179(1):1372-1394.
[3] 肖静华,吴小龙,谢康,等.信息技术驱动中国制造转型升级——美的智能制造跨越式战略变革纵向案例研究[J].管理世界,2021,37(3):161-179+225+11.
[4] 解学梅,韩宇航.本土制造业企业如何在绿色创新中实现“华丽转型”?——基于注意力基础观的多案例研究[J].管理世界,2022,38(3):76-106.
[5] 贺梅,王燕梅.制造业企业数字化转型如何影响员工工资[J].财贸经济,2023,44(4):123-139.
[6] 靳毓,文雯,何茵.数字化转型对企业绿色创新的影响——基于中国制造业上市公司的经验证据[J].财贸研究,2022,33(7):69-83.
[7] 林永佳,杨畅,蔡幸.企业数字化转型与绿色创新能力升级——基于网络效应的分析[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2023,43(2):3-19.
[8] 郭丰,杨上广,柴泽阳.企业数字化转型促进了绿色技术创新的“增量提质”吗?——基于中国上市公司年报的文本分析[J].南方经济,2023(2):146-162.
[9] 刘畅,潘慧峰,李珮,等.数字化转型对制造业企业绿色创新效率的影响和机制研究[J].中国软科学,2023(4):121-129.
[10] 李鑫,徐琼,王核成.企业数字化转型与绿色技术创新[J].统计研究,2023,40(9):107-119.
[11] 王海,郭冠宇,尹俊雅.数字化转型如何赋能企业绿色创新发展[J].经济学动态,2023(12):76-91.
[12] 高智林,谭文浩.企业数字化转型会促进绿色技术创新吗?——基于文本分析方法的经验证据[J].财经论丛,2024(1):79-91.
[13] 孙自愿,马琳,王文娇.数字赋能“有效论”:数字化转型对重污染企业绿色创新的双向效应[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2024,39(3):53-66.
[14] 蒋煦涵,章丽萍.数字化转型促进高端制造业绿色发展的路径研究[J].当代财经,2023(9):16-27.
[15] 刘文玲,万美杉,郑馨竺.数字化转型对制造业企业绿色发展绩效的影响研究[J].工业技术经济,2023,42(12):22-33.
[16] 刘文俊,彭慧.区域制造企业数字化转型影响绿色全要素生产率的空间效应[J].经济地理,2023,43(6):33-44.
[17] 马智胜,刘鹏,才凌惠.数字化转型提升了绿色全要素能源效率吗?——来自中国A股工业上市企业的经验证据[J].企业经济,2023,42(9):113-126.
[18] 吕娟,吕雁琴,杨平,等.重污染企业数字化转型对绿色生产效率的影响[J].技术经济与管理研究,2024(3):13-19.
[19] 田杰,李悦,郑权.数字化转型对重污染企业绿色投资效率的影响[J].金融理论与实践,2023(7):12-23.
[20] 汪海凤,韩刚.数字化转型对制造企业绿色投资的影响——基于内外部资源协同视角[J].金融与经济,2024(2):86-96.
[21] 高厚宾,王蔷瑞.“绿色的馈赠”:数字化转型对企业环境绩效的影响——来自中国制造业A股上市公司的经验证据[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,50(5):88-94.
[22] 热比亚·吐尔逊,巴文浩,王岚.数字化转型、绿色供应链与企业环境绩效——媒体关注的调节作用[J].中国流通经济,2023,37(10):14-25.
[23] 马苓,刘硕,郑敏娜.企业数字化转型、绿色创新与碳绩效——碳排放权交易政策与公众环境关注度的调节作用[J].研究与发展管理,2024,36(2):63-73.
[24] 田利军,李一博.数字化转型对航空碳减排的影响研究——基于内部控制与绿色技术创新双重效应的分析[J].价格理论与实践,2024(2):174-178.
[25] 曹裕,李想,胡韩莉,等.数字化如何推动制造企业绿色转型?——资源编排理论视角下的探索性案例研究[J].管理世界,2023,39(3):96-112+126+113.
[26] 李金昌,连港慧,徐蔼婷.“双碳”愿景下企业绿色转型的破局之道——数字化驱动绿色化的实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(9):27-49.
[27] 刘玉斌,王丹婵.数字化对制造业企业绿色转型的影响机制研究[J].山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,46(6):138-148.
[28] 马亮,高峻,李娅宁.数字化赋能制造企业绿色转型升级——绿色创业导向与绿色创新的链式中介作用[J/OL].科技进步与对策:1-11(2023-12-08).http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.G3.20231207.1358.011.html.
[29] 寇冬雪,张彩云,张小溪.企业数字化赋能企业绿色化转型的方式:从信息披露到创新驱动[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,24(2):48-66.
[30] GLYNN M A,LOUNSBURY M.From the critics’ corner:logic blending,discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system[J].Journal of Management Studies,2005,42(5):1031-1055.
[31] TRACEY P,PHILLIPS N,JARVIS O.Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms:a multilevel model[J].Organization Science,2011,22(1):60-80.
[32] 苏敬勤,刘畅.政府驱动逻辑与市场逻辑的关系[J].科学学研究,2019,37(11):1979-1989.
[33] 李健,李俊豪,李晏墅.数字化转型能破解企业融资约束吗?——商业信用融资视角[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2023,43(7):21-37.
[34] 叶永卫,李鑫,刘贯春.数字化转型与企业人力资本升级[J].金融研究,2022(12):74-92.
[35] 刘飞.数字化转型如何提升制造业生产率——基于数字化转型的三重影响机制[J].财经科学,2020(10):93-107.
[36] 赵宸宇,王文春,李雪松.数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率[J].财贸经济,2021,42(7):114-129.
[37] 孙鲲鹏,王丹,肖星.互联网信息环境整治与社交媒体的公司治理作用[J].管理世界,2020(7):106-132.
[38] DAI L,PARWADA J T,ZHANG B.The Governance Effect of the media’s news dissemination role:evidence from insider trading[J].Journal of Accounting Research,2015,53(2):331-366.
[39] MEYER J W,ROWAN B.Institutionalized organizations:formal structure as myth and ceremony[J].American Journal of Sociology,1977,83(2):340-363.
[40] 翟胜宝,程妍婷,许浩然,等.媒体关注与企业ESG信息披露质量[J].会计研究,2022(8):59-71.
[41] 董天一,王玉涛,孙才惠.社交媒体关注与审计质量——基于舆论压力视角的检验[J].审计研究,2022(2):71-80.
[42] 刘启亮,陆开森,李祎,等.媒体负面报道与高管腐败治理[J].会计研究,2022(3):123-135.
[43] 方明月,聂辉华,阮睿,等.企业数字化转型与经济政策不确定性感知[J].金融研究,2023(2):21-39.
[44] 饶华春.中国金融发展与企业融资约束的缓解——基于系统广义矩估计的动态面板数据分析[J].金融研究,2009(9):156-164.
[45] 龚强,班铭媛,张一林.区块链、企业数字化与供应链金融创新[J].管理世界,2021,37(2):22-34+3.
[46] LIN M,PRABHALA N R,VISWANATHAN S.Judging borrowers by the company they keep:friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending[J].Management Science,2013,59(1):17-35.
[47] 祁怀锦,曹修琴,刘艳霞.数字经济对公司治理的影响——基于信息不对称和管理者非理性行为视角[J].改革,2020(4):50-64.
[48] 黄亮雄,林子月,王贤彬.工业机器人应用与全球价值链重构——基于出口产品议价能力的视角[J].中国工业经济,2023(2):74-92.
[49] 林熙,刘啟仁,冯桂媚.智能制造与绿色发展:基于工业机器人进口视角[J].世界经济,2023,46(8):3-31.
[50] 中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组,李平.中国工业绿色转型研究[J].中国工业经济,2011(4):5-14.
[51] 万攀兵,杨冕,陈林.环境技术标准何以影响中国制造业绿色转型——基于技术改造的视角[J].中国工业经济,2021(9):118-136.
[52] RINGEL M,SCHLOMANN B,KRAIL M,et al.Towards a green economy in Germany?The role of energy efficiency policies[J].Applied Energy,2016,179(1)1293-1303.
[53] KEMP R,NEVER B.Green transition,industrial policy,and economic development[J].Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2017,33(1):66-84.
[54] ZHAI X,AN Y,SHI X,et al.Measurement of green transition and its driving factors:evidence from China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2022,335(10):130292.
[55] ZOU Z.H,YI Y,SUN J N.Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2006,18(5):1020-1023.
[56] 何郁冰,张思.技术创新持续性对企业绩效的影响研究[J].科研管理,2017,38(9):1-11.
[57] 肖仁桥,陈小婷,钱丽.异质环境规制、政府支持与企业绿色创新效率——基于两阶段价值链视角[J].财贸研究,2022,33(9):79-93.
[58] 崔兴华,林明裕.FDI如何影响企业的绿色全要素生产率?——基于Malmquist-Luenberger指数和PSM-DID的实证分析[J].经济管理,2019,41(3):38-55.
[59] 张增田,姚振玖,卢琦等.高管海外经历能促进企业绿色创新吗?[J].外国经济与管理,2023,45(8):68-82.
[60] 王辉,林伟芬,谢锐.高管环保背景与绿色投资者进入[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2022,39(12):173-194.
[61] 吴非,胡慧芷,林慧妍,等.企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J].管理世界,2021,37(7):130-144+10.
[62] 孙传旺,张文悦.对外直接投资与企业绿色转型——基于中国企业微观数据的经验研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(9):79-91.
[63] 江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济,2022(5):100-120.
[64] 于蔚,汪淼军,金祥荣.政治关联和融资约束:信息效应与资源效应[J].经济研究,2012,47(9):125-139.
[65] 宋敏,周鹏,司海涛.金融科技与企业全要素生产率——“赋能”和信贷配给的视角[J].中国工业经济,2021(4):138-155.
[66] 王永钦,董雯.机器人的兴起如何影响中国劳动力市场?——来自制造业上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2020,55(10):159-175.
[67] 王应欢,郭永祯.企业数字化转型与ESG表现——基于中国上市企业的经验证据[J].财经研究,2023,49(9):94-108.
[68] PAN A,ZHANG W,SHI X,et al.Climate policy and low-carbon innovation:evidence from low-carbon city pilots in China[J].Energy Economics,2022,112:106129.
[69] 周阔,王瑞新,陶云清,等.企业绿色化转型与股价崩盘风险[J].管理科学,2022,35(6):56-69.
[70] 林川.多个大股东能促进企业数字化转型吗[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2023(2):28-40.
[71] 邓慧慧,杨露鑫.雾霾治理、地方竞争与工业绿色转型[J].中国工业经济,2019(10):118-136.
基本信息:
中图分类号:X322;F49;F425
引用信息:
[1]林川,吴沁泽.数字化转型促进了企业绿色化转型吗?[J].西部论坛,2024,34(04):94-110.
基金信息:
重庆市教委科学技术研究重点项目(KJZD-K202100902); 四川外国语大学研究生科研创新学科项目(SISU2023XK078,SISU2023YZ067)
2024-07-25
2024-07-25
2024-07-25